Synthetic payer operations data for claims, enrollment, denials, and network analytics
Industry
Health Insurance
Company size
Regional payer with 155K covered members across employer, exchange, senior, and community products
Employer footprint
520 employer or sponsoring groups across 14 operating markets
Provider footprint
780 contracted provider groups and 12.8K providers across in-network, out-of-network, and pending-credentialing status
Analytical scale
2.25M member-month rows, 1.85M claim lines, 105K prior authorizations, 118K denial or appeal events, 190K monthly network snapshots, and 38K care-program episodes across a fixed two-year window
Core buyer promise
BI teams can trace one payer story from enrollment to claims, denial operations, network access, and care-management cohorts without protected health information
Senlora Health Plans is a fictional US health plan operator with a concentrated but multi-market footprint across 14 metro and regional insurance markets. The company balances dense employer-group enrollment in core mid-sized cities with selective exchange, senior, and community-plan presence in surrounding suburban and rural corridors. The package focuses on payer operations a BI buyer can turn into immediate dashboards: claims adjudication, member coverage movement, prior authorization friction, provider access, denial recovery, and care-program engagement. It does not pretend to be a premium-billing ledger, credentialing system, or clinical record export.
These are the operating questions this kit is optimized to answer first.
Community carries the highest denial rate and member cost share, employer group denies least, exchange asks least of members.
Infusion, outpatient surgery, and imaging clear authorization least often; inpatient and observation stays clear most.
Some provider markets show better access at higher unit cost, others lower access and more leakage pressure.
Overturned appeals return most of the denied amount, partially overturned about half, and upheld denials none at all.
Documentation and coding denials are overturned most often, while eligibility and late-filing denials almost never reverse.
Program episodes correlate with different pre and post utilization patterns without unrealistic causal promises.